Uber versus Taxi: A Driver's Eye View
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Angrist, Joshua D.; Caldwell, Sydnee; Hall, Jonathan, V
署名单位:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); IZA Institute Labor Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research; University of California System; University of California Berkeley; Uber Technologies, Inc.
刊物名称:
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS
ISSN/ISSBN:
1945-7782
DOI:
10.1257/app.20190655
发表日期:
2021
页码:
272-308
关键词:
work
aversion
摘要:
Rideshare drivers pay a proportion of their fares to a ride-hailing platform operator, a commission-based compensation model used by many service providers. To Uber drivers, this commission is known as the Uber fee. By contrast, traditional taxi drivers in most US cities make a fixed payment independent of their earnings, usually a weekly or daily medallion lease, keeping every fare dollar net of lease costs and other expenses. We assess these compensation models using an experiment that offered random samples of Boston Uber drivers opportunities to lease a virtual taxi medallion that eliminates the Uber fee. Some drivers were offered a negative fee. Drivers' labor supply response to our offers reveals a large intertemporal substitution elasticity, on the order of 1.2, and higher for those who accept lease contracts. At the same time, our virtual lease program was undersubscribed: many drivers who would have benefited from buying an inexpensive lease chose to sit out. We use these results to compute the average compensation required to make drivers indifferent between rideshare and taxi-style compensation contracts. The results suggest that rideshare drivers gain considerably from the opportunity to drive without leasing.
来源URL: