作者：Furniss, N
作者单位：Indiana University System; Indiana University Bloomington
作者：Lowery, D
作者单位：University of North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
摘要：A neoprogressive research agenda is developed to challenge public choice theory's position as the new orthodoxy in both understanding and guiding policy choices about urban service delivery. Such a challenge requires more than accumulating negative empirical tests. Rather we must accept the new burden of proof laid on proponents of progressive reform institutions by the theories of nonmarket failure and quasimarkets, ideas that undermined the intellectual pillars supporting progressive reform ...
作者：Furniss, N
作者单位：Indiana University System; Indiana University Bloomington
