Answering the public choice challenge: A neoprogressive research agenda

• 成果类型: Review
• 署名作者: Lowery, D
• 署名单位: University of North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
• 刊物名称: GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0952-1895
• DOI: 10.1111/0952-1895.00089
• 发表日期: 1999
• 关键词: regional government; ORGANIZATION; consolidation; FRAGMENTATION; privatization; segregation; CRITIQUE; support; suburbs; IMPACT

摘要

A neoprogressive research agenda is developed to challenge public choice theory's position as the new orthodoxy in both understanding and guiding policy choices about urban service delivery. Such a challenge requires more than accumulating negative empirical tests. Rather we must accept the new burden of proof laid on proponents of progressive reform institutions by the theories of nonmarket failure and quasimarkets, ideas that undermined the intellectual pillars supporting progressive reform institutions and can only be challenged by new ideas. Public choice theory itself, broadly considered, is proposed as a valid source of such new ideas. Three research programs, in part already underway, are outlined as essential building blocks in the research agenda, focusing, respectively, on blunting the rough edges of the theory of nonmarket failure, coordinating the empirical critiques of quasimarkets in a new theory of quasimarkets failure, and developing the new institutionalism so that it can provide the basis for comparing the production outcomes of alternative urban institutions.