Realized Publicness at Public and Private Research Universities

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Feeney, Mary K.; Welch, Eric W.
• 署名单位: University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Chicago; University of Illinois Chicago Hospital
• 刊物名称: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0033-3352
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02521.x
• 发表日期: 2012
• 页码: 272-284
• 关键词: life sciences; collaboration; PRODUCTIVITY; performance; scientists; management; industry; POLICY

摘要

Although research-extensive universities in the United States produce similar outcomesresearch, teaching, and servicethey vary substantially in terms of the publicness of their environments. In this article, the authors adopt a public values framework to examine how regulative, normative/associative, and cultural cognitive components affect realized public outcomes by faculty. Using survey data from a random sample of faculty scientists in six fields of science and engineering at Carnegie Research I universities, findings show that organizational and individual public values components are associated predictably with different realized individual public outcomes. For example, individual support from federal resources and affiliation with a federal lab (associative) are related to increased research outcomes, while tuition and fee levels (regulative) explain teaching outcomes, and perceived level of influence in the workplace (cultural cognitive) explains teaching and service outcomes.