Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Yi, Hongtao; Suo, Liming; Shen, Ruowen; Zhang, Jiasheng; Ramaswami, Anu; Feiock, Richard C.
• 署名单位: University System of Ohio; Ohio State University; University of Electronic Science & Technology of China; State University System of Florida; Florida State University; University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities; State University System of Florida; Florida State University
• 刊物名称: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0033-3352
• DOI: 10.1111/puar.12799
• 发表日期: 2018
• 页码: 556-566
• 关键词: economic-development; interstate compacts; UNITED-STATES; CHINA; COOPERATION; GOVERNMENT; networks; collaborations; ORGANIZATIONS; REFLECTIONS

摘要

This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreementsinformal, formal, and imposed agreementsare analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration. Evidence for Practice Informal, formal, and imposed agreements are available to public managers seeking to address regional problems. Local managers should be attentive to local economic conditions and characteristics of policy actors in choosing specific types of agreements. The number of policy actors involved is an important consideration in deciding on agreement type.