A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF COMPUTERIZING NONCOGNITIVE PAPER-AND-PENCIL MEASUREMENTS - A TEST OF MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE
成果类型：
Article
署名作者：
KING, WC; MILES, EW
署名单位：
University System of Georgia; Georgia State University
刊物名称：
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN/ISSBN：
0021-9010
发表日期：
1995
页码：
643-651
关键词：
摘要：
Previous studies have provided evidence to question the equivalence of data gathered by different administration modes and to suggest that noncognitive instruments validated for paper-and-pencil administration may not be valid for computerized administration. In this study, a series of analyses of the variance-covariance matrices tested the measurement equivalence of data collected from paper-and-pencil and computerized formats. Four work-related noncognitive psychological measures were tested in this study. There was no evidence that administration mode had an effect on measurement equivalence.