WHEN TEAMS AGREE WHILE DISAGREEING: REFLEXION AND REFLECTION IN SHARED COGNITION
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Healey, Mark P.; Vuori, Timo; Hodgkinson, Gerard P.
署名单位:
University of Manchester; Aalto University; Aalto University; University of Warwick; University of Warwick
刊物名称:
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW
ISSN/ISSBN:
0363-7425
DOI:
10.5465/amr.2013.0154
发表日期:
2015
页码:
399-422
关键词:
implicit association test
DEEP-LEVEL DIVERSITY
mental models
TOP MANAGEMENT
SUBCONSCIOUS GOALS
COORDINATING EXPERTISE
EFFECTIVE TEAMWORK
task-performance
social cognition
decision-making
摘要:
Drawing on dual-systems theory, we propose a new typology for analyzing shared cognition in workgroups and teams that differentiates reflective (Le., C-system) mental models formed through reasoning and deliberation from reflexive (i.e., X-system) representations that are more automatic, intuitive, and affective in nature. Our analysis demonstrates how team members' X-system representations pertaining to the team's task and its members can compete with shared C-system mental models of the task and team in terms of their respective effects on team functioning. We highlight the consequences for intrateam coordination when team members have similar C-system mental models but dissimilar X-system representations (illusory concordance) and when team members have similar X-system representations but dissimilar C-system mental models (surface discordance). Finally, we consider the implications of our arguments for extending current team cognition theory predicated on reflective cognition and suggest new directions for research on group cognition in organizations more generally.