SIGNALING LEGITIMACY: WHY MIXED-GENDER COALITIONS OUTPERFORM SINGLE-GENDER COALITIONS IN ADVOCATING FOR GENDER EQUITY

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Hussain, Insiya; Tangirala, Subrahmaniam; Sherf, Elad N.
• 署名单位: University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin; University System of Maryland; University of Maryland College Park; University of North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
• 刊物名称: ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0001-4273
• DOI: 10.5465/amj.2021.0174
• 发表日期: 2023
• 页码: 1233-1262
• 关键词: social-dominance orientation; affirmative-action; METAANALYTIC TEST; decision-making; sex-differences; SELLING ISSUES; women; performance; ORGANIZATIONS; CONSEQUENCES

摘要

Employees often engage in collective grassroots efforts to bring about gender equity in the workplace. Such coalition-based advocacy is largely driven by women, which has led to debate about whether men's involvement as allies can help. Integrating literatures on signaling and legitimacy, we propose that the demographic composition of a gender equity advocacy coalition matters: men-only groups lack coalition legitimacy, or the perception that they are the right spokespersons for gender equity issues, whereas women-only groups struggle to convey issue legitimacy, or the perception that gender equity is of strategic importance within business organizations. By contrast, mixed -gender coalitions signal both forms of legitimacy, and are thus uniquely effective. We demonstrate these effects over three studies: managers reporting on advocacy coalitions comprising their colleagues (Study 1), an audio-based study showing that the proposed effects are unique for gender equity issues (Study 2), and a stimulus sampling study involving multiple policy proposals (Study 3). Our findings highlight the different forms of legitimacy that women and men bring to the table when selling gender equity issues. We discuss implications for who should be recruited to gender equity advocacy coalitions, and why.