Testing Paternalism: Cash versus In-Kind Transfers

成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Cunha, Jesse M.
署名单位:
United States Department of Defense; United States Navy; Naval Postgraduate School
刊物名称:
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS
ISSN/ISSBN:
1945-7782
DOI:
10.1257/app.6.2.195
发表日期:
2014
页码:
195-230
关键词:
transfer programs food-consumption public provision private goods IMPACT nutrition Mexico redistribution ECONOMICS progresa
摘要:
Welfare programs are often implemented in-kind to promote outcomes that might not be realized under cash transfers. This paper tests whether such paternalistically motivated transfers are justified compared to cash, using a randomized controlled trial of Mexico's food assistance program. In relation to total food consumption, the in-kind transfer was infra-marginal and nondistorting. However, the transfer contained ten food items, and there was large variation in the extent to which individual foods were extra-marginal and distorting. Small differences in the nutritional intake of women and children under in-kind transfers did not lead to meaningful differential improvements in health outcomes compared to cash.
来源URL: