How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Watzinger, Martin; Fackler, Thomas A.; Nagler, Markus; Schnitzer, Monika
署名单位:
University of Munich; Centre for Economic Policy Research - UK; Leibniz Association; Ifo Institut; University of Erlangen Nuremberg
刊物名称:
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY
ISSN/ISSBN:
1945-7731
发表日期:
2020
页码:
328-359
关键词:
intellectual property-rights
patents
COMPETITION
KNOWLEDGE
FIRMS
摘要:
Is compulsory licensing an effective antitrust remedy to increase innovation? To answer this question, we analyze the 1956 consent decree that settled an antitrust lawsuit against Bell, a vertically integrated monopolist charged with foreclosing the telecommunications equipment market. Bell was forced to license all its existing patents royalty-free, including those not related to telecommunications. We identify the effect of the consent decree on follow-on innovations building on Bell patents by using exactly matched non-Bell patents as control group. We show that the consent decree led to a lasting increase in innovation but only in markets outside the telecommunications sector.