Tax Audits as Scarecrows: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiments
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Bergolo, Marcelo; Ceni, Rodrigo; Cruces, Guillermo; Giaccobasso, Matias; Perez-Truglia, Ricardo
署名单位:
Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay; Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET); National University of La Plata; University of Nottingham; University of California System; University of California Los Angeles; University of California System; University of California Berkeley
刊物名称:
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY
ISSN/ISSBN:
1945-7731
DOI:
10.1257/pol.20200321
发表日期:
2023
页码:
110-153
关键词:
PROSPECT-THEORY
ENFORCEMENT
probability
income
RISK
pay
perceptions
JUDGMENT
SALIENCE
taxation
摘要:
The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and ben-efits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with a tax authority to address this question. We sent letters to 20,440 small-and medium-sized firms that collectively paid more than US$200 million in taxes per year. We find that providing information about audits significantly affected tax compliance but in a manner that was inconsistent with Allingham and Sandmo (1972).
来源URL: