The Hedonistic Paradox:: Is homo economicus happier?

成果类型:
Review
署名作者:
Konow, James; Earley, Joseph
署名单位:
Loyola Marymount University
刊物名称:
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS
ISSN/ISSBN:
0047-2727
DOI:
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.006
发表日期:
2008
页码:
1-33
关键词:
happiness Subjective well-being altruism generosity psychological well-being eudaimonia
摘要:
The Hedonistic Paradox states that homo economicus, or someone who seeks happiness for him- or herself, will not find it, but the person who helps others will. This study examines two questions in connection with happiness and generosity. First, do more generous people, as identified in dictator experiments, report on average greater happiness, or subjective well-being (SVM), as measured by responses to various questionnaires? Second, if the answer is affirmative, what is the causal relationship between generosity and happiness? We find a favorable correlation between generosity and happiness (i.e., SWB is directly related to several measures of happiness and inversely related to unhappiness) and examine various possible explanations, including that material well-being causes both happiness and generosity. The evidence from this experiment, however, indicates that a tertiary personality variable, sometimes called psychological well-being, is the primary cause of both happiness and greater generosity. In contrast to field studies, the experimental method of this inquiry permits anonymity measures designed to minimize subject misrepresentation of intrinsic generosity (e.g., due to social approval motives) and of actual happiness (e.g., because of social desirability biases) and produces a rich data set with multiple measures of subjective, psychological and material well-being. The results of this and other studies raise the question of whether greater attention should be paid to the potential benefits (beyond solely the material ones) of policies that promote charitable donations, volunteerism, service education, and, more generally, community involvement, political action, and social institutions that foster psychological well-being. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
来源URL: