Defining the boundaries of public administration: Undisciplined mongrels versus disciplined purists
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Rodgers, R; Rodgers, N
署名单位:
University of Kentucky
刊物名称:
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
ISSN/ISSBN:
0033-3352
DOI:
10.1111/0033-3352.00106
发表日期:
2000
页码:
435-445
关键词:
affairs programs
PRODUCTIVITY
reputation
faculty
search
摘要:
Undisciplined mongrels are faculty from public administration programs who publish in a wide variety of journals. We expected that undisciplined mongrels would have more successful publishing records than their counterparts-disciplined purists who publish exclusively in public administration journals. This expectation is supported through an analysis of journal publications by a panel of PI junior faculty members. We also expected that the methods that are currently used to rank public administration programs would discard a massive body of publication activity by public administration faculty. This expectation is also soundly supported. Findings indicate that from 1990 through 1997, a scant 18 percent of the articles published by the faculty panel were published in the highly selective set of 11 journals that are currently used to rank public administration programs.