Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship: The contribution of narrative inquiry

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Dodge, J; Ospina, SM; Foldy, EG
• 署名单位: New York University
• 刊物名称: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0033-3352
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00454.x
• 发表日期: 2005
• 页码: 286-300
• 关键词: MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; leadership; KNOWLEDGE; work

摘要

A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be clone. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.