The Boston Marathon Bombings: Who's to Blame and Why It Matters for Public Administration

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Marvel, John D.
• 署名单位: George Mason University
• 刊物名称: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0033-3352
• DOI: 10.1111/puar.12263
• 发表日期: 2014
• 页码: 713-725
• 关键词: source credibility; FEDERALISM; expertise; MODEL; RISK

摘要

This article examines how elite attributions of blame-statements from politicians and high-level public administrators assigning responsibility for failure to prevent the Boston Marathon bombings-affect citizens' beliefs regarding which government organizations, if any, are culpable for failing to prevent the bombings. The primary hypothesis is that public administrators, owing to their greater credibility relative to politicians, will more strongly influence citizens' notions of who is to blame. Findings show that public administrators are viewed as significantly more credible among Democrats, and this credibility advantage translates into influence. Additionally, blame statements implicating the Federal Bureau of Investigation for failing to prevent the Boston Marathon bombings are particularly influential among Republicans, and exculpatory statements are particularly influential among Democrats. As discussed in the context of the Boston Marathon bombings, the public process of attributing blame for a perceived governmental failure has important implications for public administration.