Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings
成果类型：
Article; Proceedings Paper
署名作者：
Viswesvaran, C; Ones, DS; Schmidt, FL
署名单位：
University of Houston System; University of Houston; University of Iowa
刊物名称：
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN/ISSBN：
0021-9010
DOI：
10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557
发表日期：
1996
页码：
557-574
关键词：
摘要：
This study used meta-analytic methods to compare the interrater and intrarater reliabilities of ratings of 10 dimensions of job performance used in the literature; ratings of overall job performance were also examined. There was mixed support for the notion that some dimensions are rated more reliably than others. Supervisory ratings appear to have higher interrater reliability than peer ratings. Consistent with H. R. Rothstein (1990), mean interrater reliability of supervisory ratings of overall job performance was found to be .52. In all cases, interrater reliability is lower than intrarater reliability, indicating that the inappropriate use of intrarater reliability estimates to correct for biases from measurement error leads to biased research results. These findings have important implications for both research and practice.
来源URL：