Fifty years of methodological trends in JIBS: Why future IB research needs more triangulation
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Nielsen, Bo Bernhard; Welch, Catherine; Chidlow, Agnieszka; Miller, Stewart Robert; Aguzzoli, Roberta; Gardner, Emma; Karafyllia, Maria; Pegoraro, Diletta
署名单位:
University of Sydney; Copenhagen Business School; Aalto University; University of Birmingham; University of Texas System; University of Texas at San Antonio; Durham University; University of Nottingham
刊物名称:
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES
ISSN/ISSBN:
0047-2506
DOI:
10.1057/s41267-020-00372-4
发表日期:
2020
页码:
1478-1499
关键词:
triangulation
methodological rigor
methods diversity
methods complexity
IB paradigm
methodological bandwidth
methodological innovation
methodological trends
摘要:
We analyze methodological trends in empirical research in JIBS from 1970 to 2019. Our results point to the prevalence of the following patterns: there has been an increase in the use of (1) large-scale longitudinal, cross-national datasets, (2) complex analytical techniques, including the incorporation of multiple analytical techniques within the same study, but (3) a decline in the diversity of methods in use. We relate these trends to the underlying social, technical, and communicative conventions in the journal during the 50-year period. The observed patterns are consistent with theory that posits scientific fields entrench a dominant paradigm over time, resulting in a restricted set of methodological options being selected. Such restrictions jeopardize the quality of research because the study of any phenomenon requires the use of multiple methodological procedures to avoid the systematic biases, errors, omissions, and limitations introduced by any single option. Therefore, we propose the use of triangulation as a strategy for building methodological alternatives into research designs. Institutionalization of this principle in the field of international business has the potential to enhance both the rigor and scope of future inquiry.
来源URL: