CREDENTIALS OR CHEMISTRY? ENTREPRENEUR GENDER AND COFOUNDER SELECTION
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Gray, Steven M.; Howell, Travis; Strassman, Jamie; Yamamoto, Kendall
署名单位:
University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin; University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin
刊物名称:
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
ISSN/ISSBN:
0001-4273
DOI:
10.5465/amj.2022.0640
发表日期:
2024
页码:
1302-1330
关键词:
VENTURE CAPITALISTS EVALUATIONS
SELF-CONSTRUALS
CONJOINT-ANALYSIS
WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS
Network structure
sex-differences
teams
personality
motivation
cognition
摘要:
Research on entrepreneurial networking suggests that women may be more likely than men to select cofounders based on their resources (e.g., knowledge, skills, and experience), as a means to counteract investor bias. In contrast, research on gender in networking suggests that women may be more likely than men to select cofounders based on interpersonal attraction (e.g., liking, trustworthiness, and familiarity), because it aligns with their preference for stable and harmonious relationships. In this paper, we reconcile this tension and ask: How, when, and why do women differ from men in how they choose cofounders? We propose that women entrepreneurs generally prioritize interpersonal attraction and de-prioritize resources because doing so aligns with their interdependent self-construal, but these relationships are mitigated when legitimacy is low, such that women entrepreneurs decrease their use of interpersonal attraction and increase their focus on resources as a means to bolster legitimacy. We find support for our framework across three studies. Our findings reconcile a key tension in the literature and highlight how interdependent self-construals enable women entrepreneurs to flexibly adjust their networking approach to cofounder selection by prioritizing interpersonal attraction when legitimacy is high and by increasing their use of resource seeking when legitimacy is low.