Making Subsidies Work: Rules versus Discretion
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Cingano, Federico; Palomba, Filippo; Pinotti, Paolo; Rettore, Enrico
署名单位:
European Central Bank; Bank of Italy; Princeton University; Bocconi University; University of Padua; Fondazione Bruno Kessler; FBK-IRVAPP - Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies
刊物名称:
ECONOMETRICA
ISSN/ISSBN:
0012-9682
DOI:
10.3982/ECTA21319
发表日期:
2025
页码:
747-778
关键词:
regression discontinuity design
american recovery
POLICY
incentives
GROWTH
credit
state
摘要:
We estimate the employment effects of a large program of public investment subsidies to private firms that ranked applicants on a score reflecting both objective rules and local politicians' discretion. Leveraging the rationing of funds as an ideal Regression Discontinuity Design, we characterize the heterogeneity of treatment effects and cost-per-new-job across inframarginal firms and estimate the cost-effectiveness of subsidies under factual and counterfactual allocations. Firms ranking high on objective rules and firms preferred by local politicians generated larger employment growth on average, but the latter did so at a higher cost per job. We estimate that relying only on objective criteria would reduce the cost per job by 11%, while relying only on political discretion would increase such cost by 42%.