Evaluating case-based decision theory: Predicting empirical patterns of human classification learning

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Pape, Andreas Duus; Kurtz, Kenneth J.
• 署名单位: State University of New York (SUNY) System; Binghamton University, SUNY; State University of New York (SUNY) System; Binghamton University, SUNY
• 刊物名称: GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0899-8256
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2013.06.010
• 发表日期: 2013
• 页码: 52-65
• 关键词: Case-based decision theory; Human cognition; learning; Agent-based computational economics; PSYCHOLOGY; Cognitive science

摘要

We introduce a computer program which calculates an agent's optimal behavior according to case-based decision theory (Gilboa and Schmeidler, 1995) and use it to test CBDT against a benchmark set of problems from the psychological literature on human classification learning (Shepard et al., 1961). This allows us to evaluate the efficacy of CBDT as an account of human decision-making on this set of problems. We find: (1) The choice behavior of this program (and therefore case-based decision theory) correctly predicts the empirically observed relative difficulty of problems and speed of learning in human data. (2) 'Similarity' (how CBDT decision makers extrapolate from memory) is decreasing in vector distance, consistent with evidence in psychology (Shepard, 1987). (3) The best-fitting parameters suggest humans aspire to an 80-85% success rate, and humans may increase their aspiration level during the experiment. (4) Average similarity is rejected in favor of additive similarity. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.