A call for open science in forensics

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Albright, Thomas D.; Scurich, Nicholas
• 署名单位: Salk Institute; University of California System; University of California Irvine; University of California System; University of California Irvine
• 刊物名称: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0027-10911
• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2321809121
• 发表日期: 2024-06-11
• 关键词: ethics

摘要

The modern canon of open science consists of five schools of thought that justify unfettered access to the fruits of scientific research: i) public engagement, ii) democratic right of access, iii) efficiency of knowledge gain, iv) shared technology, and v) better assessment of impact. Here, we introduce a sixth school: due process. Due process under the law includes a right to discovery by a defendant of potentially exculpatory evidence held by the prosecution. When such evidence is scientific, due process becomes a Constitutional mandate for open science. To illustrate the significance of this new school, we present a case study from forensics, which centers on a federally funded investigation that reports summary statistics indicating that identification decisions made by forensic firearms examiners are highly accurate. Because of growing concern about validity of forensic methods, the larger scientific community called for public release of the complete analyzable dataset for independent audit and verification. Those in possession of the data opposed release for three years while summary statistics were used by prosecutors to gain admissibility of evidence in criminal trials. Those statistics paint an incomplete picture and hint at flaws in experimental design and analysis. Under the circumstances, withholding the underlying data in a criminal proceeding violates due process. Following the successful open- science model of drug validity testing through clinical trials, which place strict requirements on experimental design and timing of data release, we argue for registered and open forensic trials to ensure transparency and accountability.