Illusory interparty disagreement: Partisans agree on what hate speech to censor but do not know it

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Solomon, Brittany C.; Hall, Matthew E. K.; Hemmen, Abigail; Druckman, James N.
• 署名单位: University of Notre Dame; University of Notre Dame; University of Rochester
• 刊物名称: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0027-8821
• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402428121
• 发表日期: 2024-09-24
• 关键词: intergroup conflict; misperceptions; polarization; CONSEQUENCES

摘要

Whether and when to censor hate speech are long-standing points of contention in the US. The latest iteration of these debates entails grappling with content regulation on social media in an age of intense partisan polarization. But do partisans disagree about what types of hate speech to censor on social media or do they merely differ on how much hate speech to censor? And do they understand out-party censorship preferences? We examine these questions in a nationally representative conjoint survey experiment (participant N = 3,357; decision N = 40,284). We find that, although Democrats support more censorship than Republicans, partisans generally agree on what types of hate speech are most deserving of censorship in terms of the speech's target, source, and severity. Despite this substantial cross-party agreement, partisans mistakenly believe that members of the other party prioritize protecting different targets of hate speech. For example, a major disconnect between the two parties is that Democrats overestimate and Republicans underestimate the other party's willingness to censor speech targeting Whites. We conclude that partisan differences on censoring hate speech are largely based on free speech values and misperceptions rather than identity-based social divisions.