Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought

• 成果类型: Review
• 署名作者: Fedorenko, Evelina; Piantadosi, Steven T.; Gibson, Edward A. F.
• 署名单位: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Harvard University; University of California System; University of California Berkeley
• 刊物名称: Nature
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0028-4597
• DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07522-w
• 发表日期: 2024-06-20
• 页码: 575-586
• 关键词: multiple-demand system; vagal sensory neurons; computational principles; genetic identification; speech-perception; gabaergic neurons; neural-control; sign-language; brocas area; brain

摘要

Language is a defining characteristic of our species, but the function, or functions, that it serves has been debated for centuries. Here we bring recent evidence from neuroscience and allied disciplines to argue that in modern humans, language is a tool for communication, contrary to a prominent view that we use language for thinking. We begin by introducing the brain network that supports linguistic ability in humans. We then review evidence for a double dissociation between language and thought, and discuss several properties of language that suggest that it is optimized for communication. We conclude that although the emergence of language has unquestionably transformed human culture, language does not appear to be a prerequisite for complex thought, including symbolic thought. Instead, language is a powerful tool for the transmission of cultural knowledge; it plausibly co-evolved with our thinking and reasoning capacities, and only reflects, rather than gives rise to, the signature sophistication of human cognition. Evidence from neuroscience and related fields suggests that language and thought processes operate in distinct networks in the human brain and that language is optimized for communication and not for complex thought.