A natural experiment on the effect of herpes zoster vaccination on dementia

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Eyting, Markus; Xie, Min; Michalik, Felix; Hess, Simon; Chung, Seunghun; Geldsetzer, Pascal
• 署名单位: Stanford University; Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg; Vienna University of Economics & Business; Stanford University; Stanford University; Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI)
• 刊物名称: Nature
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0028-3519
• DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08800-x
• 发表日期: 2025-05-08
• 关键词: regression discontinuity designs; virus vasculopathy; confidence-intervals; risk-factors; environment; mortality; inference; privacy

摘要

Neurotropic herpesviruses may be implicated in the development of dementia(1, 2, 3, 4-5). Moreover, vaccines may have important off-target immunological effects(6, 7, 8-9). Here we aim to determine the effect of live-attenuated herpes zoster vaccination on the occurrence of dementia diagnoses. To provide causal as opposed to correlational evidence, we take advantage of the fact that, in Wales, eligibility for the zoster vaccine was determined on the basis of an individual's exact date of birth. Those born before 2 September 1933 were ineligible and remained ineligible for life, whereas those born on or after 2 September 1933 were eligible for at least 1 year to receive the vaccine. Using large-scale electronic health record data, we first show that the percentage of adults who received the vaccine increased from 0.01% among patients who were merely 1 week too old to be eligible, to 47.2% among those who were just 1 week younger. Apart from this large difference in the probability of ever receiving the zoster vaccine, individuals born just 1 week before 2 September 1933 are unlikely to differ systematically from those born 1 week later. Using these comparison groups in a regression discontinuity design, we show that receiving the zoster vaccine reduced the probability of a new dementia diagnosis over a follow-up period of 7 years by 3.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-7.1, P = 0.019), corresponding to a 20.0% (95% CI = 6.5-33.4) relative reduction. This protective effect was stronger among women than men. We successfully confirm our findings in a different population (England and Wales's combined population), with a different type of data (death certificates) and using an outcome (deaths with dementia as primary cause) that is closely related to dementia, but less reliant on a timely diagnosis of dementia by the healthcare system(10). Through the use of a unique natural experiment, this study provides evidence of a dementia-preventing or dementia-delaying effect from zoster vaccination that is less vulnerable to confounding and bias than the existing associational evidence.