-
作者:Grossman, Nienke
作者单位:University System of Maryland; University of Baltimore
-
作者:Ruys, Tom
作者单位:Ghent University
-
作者:Deeks, Ashley S.
作者单位:University of Virginia
摘要:The Bush administration took a maximalist approach to the jus ad bellum and jus in bello, staking out broad claims about what international law permitted in resorting to force and detaining and interrogating Al Qaeda members. In contrast, the Obama administration established more minimalist policies, which authorized a narrower scope of action than what international law permits. The Obama approach improved relations with allies and deferred difficult interagency debates. But it also incurred ...
-
作者:Daugirdas, Kristina; Mortenson, Julian Davis
-
作者:Tsagourias, Nicholas
作者单位:University of Sheffield
-
作者:Cerna, Christina M.
作者单位:Georgetown University
-
作者:Daugirdas, Kristina; Mortenson, Julian Davis
-
作者:Daugirdas, Kristina; Mortenson, Julian Davis; Cook
-
作者:Matheson, Michael J.; Scheffer, David
作者单位:George Washington University; Northwestern University; Northwestern University
-
作者:Bradley, Curtis A.; Goldsmith, Jack L.
作者单位:Duke University; Harvard University
摘要:The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) remains the principal legal foundation under U.S. domestic law for the president to use force against and detain members of terrorist organizations. This essay explains how the Obama administration established the AUMF as the legal foundation for indefinite conflict against Al Qaeda, associated groups, and the Islamic State. It also shows that the administration's claim that international law operated as an important constraint on its act...