The Task Space: An Integrative Framework for Team Research

• 成果类型: Article; Early Access
• 署名作者: Hu, Xinlan Emily; Whiting, Mark E.; Gandhi, Linnea; Watts, Duncan J.; Almaatouq, Abdullah
• 署名单位: University of Pennsylvania; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); University of Pennsylvania; University of Pennsylvania; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
• 刊物名称: MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0025-1909
• DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.03544
• 发表日期: 2026
• 关键词: organizational studies; effectiveness-performance; group tasks; Generalizability; statistics; Design of experiments

摘要

Research on teams spans many contexts, but integrating knowledge from heterogeneous sources is challenging because studies typically examine different tasks that cannot be directly compared. Most investigations involve teams working on just one or a handful of tasks, and researchers lack principled ways to quantify how similar or different these tasks are from one another. We address this challenge by introducing the Task Space, a multidimensional space in which tasks-and the distances between them-can be represented formally, and use it to create a Task Map of 102 crowd-annotated tasks from the published experimental literature. We then demonstrate the Task Space's utility by performing an integrative experiment that addresses a fundamental question in team research: when do interacting groups outperform individuals? Our experiment samples 20 diverse tasks from the Task Map at three complexity levels and recruits 1,231 participants to work either individually or in groups of three or six (180 experimental conditions). We find striking heterogeneity in group advantage, with groups performing anywhere from three times worse to 60% better than the best individual working alone, depending on the task context. Critically, the Task Space makes this heterogeneity predictable: it significantly outperforms traditional typologies in predicting group advantage on unseen tasks. Our models also reveal theoretically meaningful interactions between task features; for example, group advantage on creative tasks depends on whether the answers are objectively verifiable. We conclude by arguing that the Task Space enables researchers to integrate findings across different experiments, thereby building cumulative knowledge about team performance.