GIVING THE TREATY A PURPOSE: COMPARING THE DURABILITY OF TREATIES AND EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Nyarko, Julian
• 署名单位: Columbia University
• 刊物名称: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0002-9300
• DOI: 10.1017/ajil.2018.103
• 发表日期: 2019
• 页码: 54-89
• 关键词: regression-models; article-ii; EFFICIENCY; hazards; STATES

摘要

Scholars have argued that Senate-approved treaties are becoming increasingly irrelevant in the United States, because their role can be fulfilled by their close but less politically costly cousin, the congressional-executive agreement. This study demonstrates that treaties are more durable than congressional-executive agreements, supporting the view that there are qualitative differences between the two instruments. Abandoning the treaty may therefore lead to unintended consequences by decreasing the tools that the executive has available to design optimal agreements.