AN OPTIONS APPROACH TO AGENCY RULEMAKING

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Lee, Yoon-Ho Alex
• 署名单位: University of Southern California
• 刊物名称: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0001-8368
• 发表日期: 2013
• 页码: 881-943
• 关键词: uncertainty; rules; ECONOMICS; capture

摘要

Administrative agencies must often engage in rulemaking in the presence of substantial factual uncertainty, mixed empirical findings, and untested claims. Given these challenges, a recent D.C. Circuit case, Business Roundtable v. SEC, 647 E3d 1144 (D.C. Cir. 2011), is thought to have significantly raised the bar for rulemaking by independent agencies. Under the standard the court applied, many potentially efficient rules may not survive judicial review because agencies lack the hard data required with which to refute speculative comments. In response, this Essay suggests that agencies should take a more outcome-oriented approach to rulemaking by making use of options. In particular, when an agency is seeking to adopt a controversial rule against opposition from strong interest groups, it should strategically commit to an efficient ex post modification of the substance or the coverage of the rule and thereby partly relieve itself of its ex ante burden of justification. The agency's ex ante burden of justification should be reduced because of the rule comes coupled with an enforceable, efficient ex post modification scheme, its net expected benefit will necessarily be higher. Specifically, as compared to the case when the rule is adopted without such a scheme conferring option values, the economic cost of the rule will be reduced by the value of a contingent ex post repeal (under the real options approach) or the value of conditional ex post exemptions (under the menu-of-options approach). Reviewing courts, in turn, should recognize this higher net expected benefit resulting from the option value of the rule structure, and should therefore be more deferential to the agency's policy choice in such instances. As with the case of options generally, this approach is particularly valuable when the variance of the net expected benefit is high. This Essay discusses the theoretical framework of the suggested approach, its proper scope as well as potential pitfalls, and the simplest ways to implement it.