Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Rutz, Suzanne; Mathew, Dinah; Robben, Paul; de Bont, Antoinette
署名单位:
Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
刊物名称:
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE
ISSN/ISSBN:
1748-5983
DOI:
10.1111/rego.12101
发表日期:
2017
页码:
81-94
关键词:
street-level bureaucracy
relational regulation
care
professionals
management
issues
摘要:
Discretion used to be considered a feature of individuals, but growing literature shows that it has collective features as well. To develop an understanding of the individual and cooperative work of inspectors in using discretion and the discretionary room granted to them, we compared two inspectorates: the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England and the Joint Inspectorate for Youth (JIY) in the Netherlands. Our analysis reveals that inspectors engage with colleagues, managers, and stakeholders to include other perspectives, gain mandate, and broaden their repertoire. At the CQC, inspectors use their discretion collectively; on their own initiative, they involve others in balancing and interpreting rules to reach judgments. At the JIY, teamwork is central and regulatory teams are granted collective discretionary room. We argue that collective work permits both responsiveness and consistency. In studying the judgments of inspectors and other street-level bureaucrats, it is vital to look at collective work and how it combines consistency and responsiveness.
来源URL: