Efficient Estimation of the Cox Model with Auxiliary Subgroup Survival Information
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Huang, Chiung-Yu; Qin, Jing; Tsai, Huei-Ting
署名单位:
Johns Hopkins University; Johns Hopkins Medicine
刊物名称:
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN/ISSBN:
0162-1459
DOI:
10.1080/01621459.2015.1044090
发表日期:
2016
页码:
787-799
关键词:
continuous androgen deprivation
individual patient data
empirical-likelihood
estimating equations
prostate-cancer
metaanalysis
regression
intermittent
摘要:
With the rapidly increasing availability of data in the public domain, combining information from different sources to infer about associations or differences of interest has become an emerging challenge to researchers. This article presents a novel approach to improve efficiency in estimating the survival time distribution by synthesizing information from the individual-level data with t-year survival probabilities from external sources such as disease registries. While disease registries provide accurate and reliable overall survival statistics for the disease population, critical pieces of information that influence both choice of treatment and clinical outcomes usually are not available in the registry database. To combine with the published information, we propose to summarize the external survival information via a system of nonlinear population moments and estimate the survival time model using empirical likelihood methods. The proposed approach is more flexible than the conventional meta-analysis in the sense that it can automatically combine survival information for different subgroups and the information may be derived from different studies. Moreover, an extended estimator that allows for a different baseline risk in the aggregate data is also studied. Empirical likelihood ratio tests are proposed to examine whether the auxiliary survival information is consistent with the individual-level data. Simulation studies show that the proposed estimators yield a substantial gain in efficiency over the conventional partial likelihood approach. Two sets of data analysis are conducted to illustrate the methods and theory.