Audit fee residuals: Costs or rents?

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Doogar, Rajib; Sivadasan, Padmakumar; Solomon, Ira
• 署名单位: University of Washington; University of Washington Bothell; Tulane University
• 刊物名称: REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES
• ISSN/ISSBN: 1380-6653
• DOI: 10.1007/s11142-015-9322-2
• 发表日期: 2015
• 页码: 1247-1286
• 关键词: business risk; nonaudit; INDEPENDENCE; services; engagements; firm

摘要

Audit fee residuals (the error term from audit fee models) are widely used in the accounting research literature. Researchers, however, have adopted contrasting views of these fee residuals. One view is that fee residuals are a combination of noise and auditor rents (i.e., abnormal profits), while the other view is that they are a combination of noise and unobserved audit costs (including any risk premium and a normal rate of return on all factors of production). As a result, identical research findings are presently given conflicting policy interpretations. We use differences in fee residual persistence across continuing and new audit engagements to elucidate the extent to which fee residuals consist of unobserved audit costs, auditor rents, and noise elements. In a large sample of U.S. public company audit engagements, we find evidence suggesting that fee residuals largely consist of researcher-unobserved audit production costs common to all auditors. We discuss the implications of this finding for policy setters and for future auditing research.