Accounting comparability and relative performance evaluation in CEO compensation

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Lobo, Gerald J.; Neel, Michael; Rhodes, Adrienne
• 署名单位: University of Houston System; University of Houston; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Mays Business School
• 刊物名称: REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES
• ISSN/ISSBN: 1380-6653
• DOI: 10.1007/s11142-018-9447-1
• 发表日期: 2018
• 页码: 1137-1176
• 关键词: Financial statement comparability; mandatory ifrs adoption; executive-compensation; Managerial compensation; moral hazard; earnings; CONTRACTS; MARKET; STANDARDS; COMPETITION

摘要

We investigate whether accounting comparability is associated with the likelihood that CEO compensation is tied to relative accounting performance (e.g., return on assets). We predict that higher accounting comparability increases the risk-sharing benefit of accounting-based RPE because peer firm performance better controls for common risk in RPE firm performance. Thus, firms that have higher accounting comparability with potential performance peers will be more likely to include accounting-based RPE as a component of the total CEO compensation contract. We find support for this prediction using (1) an explicit test design that relies on the ex ante terms of CEO compensation contracts obtained from proxy disclosures, and (2) an implicit design that relies on the actual realizations of CEO compensation. To provide further evidence, we examine the association between accounting comparability and the selection of performance peers when the CEO compensation contract includes an accounting-based RPE component. We find that higher comparability between the RPE firm and a potential peer firm increases (decreases) the potential peer firm's likelihood of being selected into (dropped from) the peer group. Cross-sectional analyses show that this association is less pronounced, or not present, when the relative performance measure is price-based (as opposed to accounting-based), indicating that these results do not merely reflect a more general role of comparability in all RPE contracts.