Social Comparison on Multiple Tasks: Sacrificing Overall Performance for Local Excellence?
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Kohler, Maximilian; Mahlendorf, Matthias d.; Seiter, Mischa; Vogelsang, Timo
署名单位:
Ulm University; Frankfurt School Finance & Management
刊物名称:
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH
ISSN/ISSBN:
0021-8456
DOI:
10.1111/1475-679X.12535
发表日期:
2024
页码:
1309-1361
关键词:
effort allocation
INFORMATION
feedback
incentives
rank
摘要:
This field experiment investigates how different levels of aggregation in relative performance information (RPI) impact employee performance in environments with multiple tasks. We randomly assign store employees of a retail chain to three groups: RPI on overall performance (control group), RPI on separate tasks, and RPI on both overall performance and separate tasks. We do not find evidence that providing separate task RPI instead of overall RPI affects performance or effort allocation. However, providing RPI on both overall performance and separate tasks seems to reduce performance, especially in the low-return task. This suggests that detailed RPI directs employees' attention to the smaller benefits of low-return tasks. We further find that only 30.5% of the employees accessed their performance reports, highlighting a distinction between providing RPI in the field and the laboratory. This study is based on a registered report accepted by the Journal of Accounting Research.
来源URL: