The Worth of Fair Value Accounting: Dissonance between Users and Standard Setters

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Georgiou, Omiros
• 署名单位: University of Manchester
• 刊物名称: CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0823-9150
• DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12342
• 发表日期: 2018
• 页码: 1297-1331
• 关键词: PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; FINANCIAL ECONOMICS; setting process; INFORMATION; valuation; TRANSFORMATION; CONSTRUCTION; compromise; contribute; sociology

摘要

Investors and analysts are designated as the primary users of financial reports by standard setters, yet we know very little about their use of accounting information and about their relationship with standard setters. This paper explores how investors and analysts evaluate the usefulness of fair values to their work. Standard setters typically presume that investors and analysts view accounting as a practice of valuation and, therefore, favor the greater use of fair value measurement. However, using interview evidence, it is shown here that investors and analysts expect accounting to provide them with insights into the performance of a business, and are quite cautious about the limits of using fair values in financial reports. Overall, the paper contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between accounting and its users. It adds specifically to research which has analyzed the disconnect between users and standard setters in terms of standard setters ignoring user needs (Young ), and in terms of users being indifferent about, or uncritical of, outcomes of standard-setting processes (Durocher, Fortin, and Cote ; Durocher and Gendron ). The paper suggests a re-theorization of the disconnect between the two groups that involves thinking away from tension, or blame. Drawing on the work of David Stark (2009), the situation observed is conceptualized as one of dissonance, where the different ways of evaluating fair values coexist without being involved in a fierce contest. That is, even though the principles of valuation and performance differ, this difference does not lead to open disagreement and political lobbying from investors and analysts. Consequences of this dissonance to our understandings of the (absence of) worth of fair values in capital markets are discussed.