An Examination of Effective IT Governance in the Public Sector Using the Legal View of Agency Theory
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Dawson, Gregory S.; Denford, James S.; Williams, Clay K.; Preston, David; Desouza, Kevin C.
署名单位:
Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Royal Military College - Canada; Royal Military College - Canada; Southern Illinois University System; Southern Illinois University Edwardsville; Texas Christian University; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Brookings Institution
刊物名称:
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ISSN/ISSBN:
0742-1222
DOI:
10.1080/07421222.2016.1267533
发表日期:
2016
页码:
1180-1208
关键词:
information-technology
performance
IMPACT
ORGANIZATIONS
motivation
GOVERNMENT
INNOVATION
OWNERSHIP
alignment
BUSINESS
摘要:
In the private sector, research on information technology (IT) governance has frequently applied the classical view of agency theory and focused on the controlling role played by the board of directors in constraining a potentially opportunistic manager/agent. However, in the public sector, the board of directors does not exist and there may be less need to focus on the controlling aspect of governance and more need to focus on the politically challenging distribution of state resources. In this U.S.-state-based study, we adopt, apply, and extend the legal view of agency theory past its sole focus on the board of directors as the solitary mediating hierarch in order to examine the strategic mediating hierarch role played by the state legislature and then conceptualize and test for the existence of a tactical mediating hierarch played by the IT steering committee and the production role of an independent Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) in using a fee-for-service funding model. We apply these concepts to extend theory to examine the combination of roles that lead to superior outcomes for the state (the principal) versus those necessary for the IT department (the agent). Our results show that by shifting from the control-oriented view of governance in the private sector to a more mediating view in the public sector, important practices may be portable between the public and private sector, despite their widely differing structures.