Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Chidambaram, L; Tung, LL
署名单位:
University of Oklahoma System; University of Oklahoma - Norman
刊物名称:
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH
ISSN/ISSBN:
1047-7047
DOI:
10.1287/isre.1050.0051
发表日期:
2005
页码:
149-168
关键词:
COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION
FACE-TO-FACE
GROUP DECISION-MAKING
group-size
information-technology
electronic meetings
group productivity
IDEA GENERATION
performance
task
摘要:
Research on group behavior has identified social loafing, i.e., the tendency of members to do less than their potential, as a particularly serious problem plaguing groups. Social Impact Theory (SIT) helps explain social loafing in terms of two theoretical dimensions - the dilution effect (where an individual feels submerged in the group) and the immediacy gap (where an individual feels isolated from the group). In this study, which employed a controlled experiment, we investigated these dimensions of social loafing in the context of group decision making, using collocated and distributed teams of varying sizes. Our results - in line with SIT - indicate that small groups, signifying a small dilution effect, had increased individual contributions and better group outcomes compared to their larger counterparts. However, support for SIT's arguments about the immediacy gap was mixed: Members contributed visibly more when they were collocated, but no significant differences in group outcomes were evident. Regardless of dimension, the quality of the input (ideas generated) determined the quality of the output (decisions made). Also, contrary to the literature on brainstorming, having more ideas to work with resulted in poorer-quality decisions. This apparent paradox is explained using the notion of integrative complexity, which challenges conventional wisdom regarding the relationship between individual inputs and group outputs. The implications of these results for practice and research are examined.
来源URL: