Judge: Don't Vote!

成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Balinski, Michel; Laraki, Rida
署名单位:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Institut Polytechnique de Paris; Ecole Polytechnique; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universite PSL; Universite Paris-Dauphine; Institut Polytechnique de Paris; Ecole Polytechnique
刊物名称:
OPERATIONS RESEARCH
ISSN/ISSBN:
0030-364X
DOI:
10.1287/opre.2014.1269
发表日期:
2014
页码:
483-511
关键词:
Strategy-proofness majority judgment ARROWS CONDITIONS equity
摘要:
This article argues that the traditional model of the theory of social choice is not a good model and does not lead to acceptable methods of ranking and electing. It presents a more meaningful and realistic model that leads naturally to a method of ranking and electing-majority judgment-that better meets the traditional criteria of what constitutes a good method. It gives descriptions of its successful use in several different practical situations and compares it with other methods including Condorcet's, Borda's, first-past-the-post, and approval voting.
来源URL: