Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Grolleau, Gilles; Kocher, Martin G.; Sutan, Angela
署名单位:
Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (Inserm); Institut Agro; Montpellier SupAgro; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universite de Montpellier; Universite Bourgogne Europe; University of Munich; Queensland University of Technology (QUT); University of Gothenburg; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); CNRS - Institute for Humanities & Social Sciences (INSHS); Institut Agro; Montpellier SupAgro; Universite de Montpellier
刊物名称:
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
ISSN/ISSBN:
0025-1909
DOI:
10.1287/mnsc.2015.2313
发表日期:
2016
页码:
3428-3438
关键词:
Cheating
Lying
loss aversion
experiment
摘要:
Does the extent of cheating depend on a proper reference point? We use a real-effort matrix task that implements a two (gain versus loss frame) times two (monitored performance versus unmonitored performance) between-subjects design with 600 experimental participants to examine whether the extent of cheating is reference dependent. Self-reported performance in the unmonitored condition is significantly higher than actual performance in the monitored condition-a clear indication of cheating. However, the level of cheating is by far higher in the loss frame than in the gain frame under no monitoring. The fear of a loss seems to lead to more dishonest behavior than the lure of a gain.