Inventory Commitment and Monetary Compensation Under Competition

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Lei, Junfei; Zhang, Fuqiang; Zhang, Renyu; Yu, Yugang
• 署名单位: INSEAD Business School; Washington University (WUSTL); Chinese University of Hong Kong; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Science & Technology of China, CAS
• 刊物名称: M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
• ISSN/ISSBN: 1523-4614
• DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0411
• 发表日期: 2023
• 页码: 2142-2159
• 关键词: inventory availability; retail competition; inventory commitment; monetary compensation

摘要

Problem definition: Inventory commitment and monetary compensation are widely recognized as effective strategies in monopoly settings when customers are concerned about stockouts. To attract more customer traffic, a firm reveals its inventory availability information to customers before the sales season or offers monetary compensation to placate customers if the product is out of stock. This paper investigates these two strategies when retailers compete on both price and inventory availability. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic framework to analyze the strategic interactions among the retailers and customers and draw the following insights. First, both inventory commitment and monetary compensation may lead to a prisoner's dilemma. Although these strategies are preferred regardless of the competitor's price and inventory decisions, the equilibrium profit of each retailer could be lower in the presence of inventory commitment or monetary compensation because they intensify the competition between the retailers. Second, we find that market competition may hurt social welfare compared with a centralized setting by reducing the product availability in equilibrium. The inventory commitment and monetary compensation strategies further intensify the competition between the retailers, therefore causing an even lower social welfare. Managerial implications: Our study shows that, although inventory commitment and monetary compensation improve retailers' profit and social welfare under monopoly, these strategies should be used with caution under competition.