Supply Chain Design and Carbon Penalty: Monopoly vs. Monopolistic Competition

成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Park, Seung Jae; Cachon, Gerard P.; Lai, Guoming; Seshadri, Sridhar
署名单位:
Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University Central Texas; University of Pennsylvania; University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin; Indian School of Business (ISB)
刊物名称:
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
ISSN/ISSBN:
1059-1478
DOI:
10.1111/poms.12373
发表日期:
2015
页码:
1494-1508
关键词:
sustainability supply chain design policy making Carbon tax monopolistic competition
摘要:
This paper studies whether imposing carbon costs changes the supply chain structure and social welfare. We explore the problem from a central policymaker's perspective who wants to maximize social welfare. We consider two stakeholders, retailers, and consumers, who optimize their own objectives (i.e., profits and net utility) and three competitive settings (i.e., monopoly, monopolistic competition with symmetric market share, and monopolistic competition with asymmetric market share). For the monopoly case, we find that when the retailer's profit is high, imposing some carbon emission charges on the retailer and the consumers does not substantially change the supply chain structure or the social welfare. However, when the retailer's profit is low, imposing carbon costs optimally can lead to a significant increase in social welfare. Moreover, the impact of imposing carbon emission charges becomes more significant when the degree of competition increases. Additionally, the quantum of benefit may depend only on factors common across industries, such as fuel and carbon costs.
来源URL: