ARE FOUNDER CEOS MORE OVERCONFIDENT THAN PROFESSIONAL CEOS? EVIDENCE FROM S&P 1500 COMPANIES
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Lee, Joon Mahn; Hwang, Byoung-Hyoun; Chen, Hailiang
署名单位:
Purdue University System; Purdue University; Cornell University; Korea University; City University of Hong Kong
刊物名称:
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
ISSN/ISSBN:
0143-2095
DOI:
10.1002/smj.2519
发表日期:
2017
页码:
751-769
关键词:
Overconfidence
founder CEOs
professional CEOs
corporate governance
摘要:
Research summary: We provide evidence that founder chief executive officers (CEOs) of large S&P 1500 companies are more overconfident than their nonfounder counterparts (professional CEOs). We measure overconfidence via tone of CEO tweets, tone of CEO statements during earnings conference calls, management earnings forecasts, and CEO option-exercise behavior. Compared with professional CEOs, founder CEOs use more optimistic language on Twitter and during earnings conference calls. In addition, founder CEOs are more likely to issue earnings forecasts that are too high; they are also more likely to perceive their firms to be undervalued, as implied by their option-exercise behavior. We provide evidence that, to date, investors appear unaware of this overconfidence bias among founders. Managerial summary: This article helps to explain why firms managed by founder chief executive officers (CEOs) behave differently from those managed by professional CEOs. We study a sample of S&P 1500 firms and find strong evidence that founder CEOs are more overconfident than professional CEOs. To date, investors appear unaware of this overconfidence bias among founders. Our study should help firm stakeholders, including investors, employees, suppliers, and customers, put the statements and actions of founder CEOs in perspective. Our study should also help members of corporate boards make more informed decisions about whether to retain (or bring back) founder CEOs or hire professional CEOs. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.