Neo-carnegie:: The carnegie school′s past, present, and reconstructing for the future

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Gavetti, Giovanni; Levinthal, Daniel; Ocasio, William
• 署名单位: Harvard University; University of Pennsylvania; Northwestern University
• 刊物名称: ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
• ISSN/ISSBN: 1047-7039
• DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0277
• 发表日期: 2007
• 页码: 523-536
• 关键词: carnegie school; decision making; bounded rationality; loose coupling

摘要

Cyert and March's (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm and the broader Camegie School form critical theoretical underpinnings for modem organization studies. Despite its impact, however, we suggest that researchers who rely on the Camegie School have progressively lost touch with its defining commitment to a decision-centered view of organizations. Decision making has given way to learning, routines, and an increased focus on change and adaptation; the organizational level of analysis, although frequently invoked, has been largely supplanted by either a more micro or a more macro focus. In this paper, we argue for restoring the School's original mission and perspective. Our proposal for how this overarching goal can be achieved encompasses three central points. First, we believe the School needs to resurrect a few select ideas that, despite their fundamental importance, have been neglected over time. Second, we believe there is a need for greater paradigmatic closure amongst the School's central theoretical pillars. Loose coupling among such pillars might keep key insights on organizational decision making from emerging. Finally, there is the need to incorporate major developments that have been generated post-Camegie School, both within organization theory and in the behavioral and social sciences more broadly. In particular, we point to the shift to more open systems perspectives on organizations, the conceptions of organizations being embedded in larger social contexts, and recent developments in the study of individual cognition.