Too Much Trust in Group Decisions: Uncovering Hidden Profiles by Groups and Markets

成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Maciejovsky, Boris; Budescu, David, V
署名单位:
University of California System; University of California Riverside; Fordham University
刊物名称:
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
ISSN/ISSBN:
1047-7039
DOI:
10.1287/orsc.2020.1363
发表日期:
2020
页码:
1497-1514
关键词:
trust MARKETS groups decision making prediction markets
摘要:
A crucial challenge for organizations is to pool and aggregate information effectively. Traditionally, organizations have relied on committees and teams, but recently many organizations have explored the use of information markets. In this paper, the authors compared groups and markets in their ability to pool and aggregate information in a hidden-profiles task. In Study 1, groups outperformed markets when there were no conflicts of interest among participants, whereas markets outperformed groups when conflicts of interest were present. Also, participants had more trust in groups to uncover hidden profiles than in markets. Study 2 generalized these findings to a simple prediction task, confirming that people had more trust in groups than in markets. These results were not qualified by conflicts of interest. Drawing on experienced forecasters from Good Judgment Open, Study 3 found that familiarity and experience with markets increased the endorsement and use of markets relative to traditional committees.