EVENHANDEDNESS IN RESOURCE ALLOCATION: ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH CEO IDEOLOGY, ORGANIZATIONAL DISCRETION, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE

成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Gupta, Abhinav; Briscoe, Forrest; Hambrick, Donald C.
署名单位:
University of Washington; University of Washington Seattle; Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE); Pennsylvania State University; Pennsylvania State University - University Park
刊物名称:
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
ISSN/ISSBN:
0001-4273
DOI:
10.5465/amj.2016.1155
发表日期:
2018
页码:
1848-1868
关键词:
internal capital-markets TOP MANAGEMENT POLITICAL ORIENTATION distributive justice pay PERSPECTIVE strategy personality incentives EQUALITY
摘要:
We develop a new explanation for why some organizations are relatively evenhanded, while others are more disparate, in allocating resources to subunits. Recognizing the central role of chief executive officers (CEOs) in resource allocation, we argue that CEOs' personal values regarding egalitarianism, as manifested in their political ideologies, will lead to different allocation styles. Liberal CEOs will favor evenhandedness, while conservatives will tolerate greater disparities. Placing this primary expectation in a social context, we then argue that the effects of a CEO's values are amplified when aligned with the prevailing ideology among organizational members, and conversely are muted when misaligned. Then, examining how instrumental incentives moderate the enactment of CEO values, we envision motivated cognition as a potent psychological process, which leads CEOs to double down on their personal values when they have more to gain or lose (when pay is more equity-based or the CEO has larger shareholdings). Finally, we consider the implications of our values-based framework for firm performance, arguing that evenhanded allocations are beneficial when organizational ideology is liberal, but harmful when the organization leans conservative. We test our ideas on a sample of multibusiness firms, using personal political donations to capture ideologies. We find considerable support for our hypotheses.