PUBLIC-PRIVATE AND PRIVATE-PRIVATE COLLABORATION AS PATHWAYS FOR SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL INNOVATION: EVIDENCE FROM ANTIMICROBIAL DRUG-DEVELOPMENT TASKS

• 成果类型: Article
• 署名作者: Arslan, Birgul; Vasudeva, Gurneeta; Hirsch, Elizabeth b.
• 署名单位: Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam; University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities; University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities
• 刊物名称: ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
• ISSN/ISSBN: 0001-4273
• DOI: 10.5465/amj.2021.1260
• 发表日期: 2024
• 页码: 554-582
• 关键词: research-and-development; absorptive-capacity; Transaction cost; governance; KNOWLEDGE; COORDINATION; DESIGN; biotechnology; ORGANIZATION; institutions

摘要

Although public-private collaboration abounds in addressing societal grand challenges, little is known about its performance relative to private-sector collaboration. Drawing from the innovation collaboration literature, and qualitative insights from interviews and contracts, we argue that collaboration risk impairs task performance of public- private versus private-private collaboration. We attribute this to two collaboration risk mechanisms: cooperation problems arising from misaligned social versus economic incentives, and coordination problems due to differences in organizational governance and processes. We test our hypotheses using the development history of 2,496 antimicrobial drugs from 1995-2019. After accounting for endogenous selection into collaboration, we find that public-private collaboration is less effective than private-private collaboration. However, this performance gap reduces for innovation tasks under high technological uncertainty (i.e., in the discovery stage and for developing new drug action mechanisms). To probe the distinctive cooperation and coordination mechanisms, we also examine innovation task efficiency. Findings reveal a wider gap in task effectiveness but not efficiency between public-private and private-private collaboration, suggesting more significant cooperation than coordination problems. Our theoretical and practical insights pertain to whether, when, and how public-private and private-private collaboration offer viable pathways for socially beneficial innovation tasks.