Are Analyst Top Picks Informative?
成果类型:
Article
署名作者:
Birru, Justin; Gokkaya, Sinan; Liu, Xi; Stulz, Rene
署名单位:
University System of Ohio; Ohio State University; University System of Ohio; Ohio University; University System of Ohio; Miami University; National Bureau of Economic Research
刊物名称:
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES
ISSN/ISSBN:
0893-9454
DOI:
10.1093/rfs/hhad099
发表日期:
2024
页码:
1538
关键词:
CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST
EARNINGS FORECASTS
GLOBAL SETTLEMENT
performance
recommendations
BEHAVIOR
IMPACT
stocks
RISK
BIAS
摘要:
Following the Global Settlement, analysts extensively use a top pick designation allowing for greater granularity of information among buy recommended stocks, but conflicts of interest can potentially influence this designation. Examining a novel sample of top picks, we find that a calendar-time portfolio of top picks generates an abnormal performance of 17.6% per year. Top picks have greater investment value than do buy recommendations and alternative analyst investment strategies. Both institutional and retail investors trade in response to top picks. However, only institutional investors appear to identify top picks that have greater investment value when they are announced.